Netflix and the Future of Entertainment

It’s been said for a long time now that Netflix is leading the future of entertainment.  Many people saw it years ago when they were taking business from Blockbuster Entertainment and other video stores, and amazingly, they did nothing to counter this.  Despite the fact that Netflix’s model was working better than theirs, the heads of Blockbuster ignored these obvious signs and continued their business as usual rather than adjusting and evolving.  This was due in large part to ego.  I know because I’ve talked with someone who served as president for a time at Blockbuster and left because he saw that no one would even consider changing tactics.  When he pointed this out, they ignored him and kept their ship driving right into the iceberg.

            Now Netflix is continuing their innovative efforts in competition with regular television.  What’s amazing is how little these networks have learned from Blockbuster.  They believe that, because they are the big guys on the block today, they are destined to always be that way.

            To be sure, they are adjusting in some ways, but usually they are the wrong ways.  CBS is beginning a subscription service that will be led by their Star Trek series in which viewers will have to pay to watch.  However, viewers aren’t going to see any reason to pay for this television service that they are getting for free with other shows unless CBS offers something more.  Of course, they’ll have some shows that they know audiences will want on the subscription channel, but that’s not enough.

            What’s caused viewers to turn to Netflix is that their programming has been more interesting and innovative than network TV.  Rather than following tired formulas and using outdated methods, they have created new ways of telling stories both artistically and technically.

            Artistically, they tell stories in unique fashions and they make sure the entire show is aired so the whole story is there.  What I mean by unique fashions is that they do not limit their writers to specific formula patterns.  On television, you have five acts broken up by commercials.  Every show has to follow those acts, and executives will require that producers break down their scripts into these acts to prove it.  Netflix makes no such requirement, and thus the stories are more interesting.

This is further improved by the fact that they don’t make pilots, see how they go, then just a few episodes and see how they go before making entire seasons.  Networks do this all the time, and it makes for very broken up storylines.  Worst yet, they will cancel a show if it’s not doing well.  This may save them money in the short run, but it destroys trust in the viewer, who decides not to watch the next show.

Many people will not waste their time on a network show because that show may be cancelled next week.  There’s no point in wasting the time getting invested.  But with Netflix, you know that if you try a show out, they’ll at least get through a season, so there will be some semblance of a story.

Basically, think of it like this.  If you buy a book, would you rather get one that the author is still writing and might not finish, or would you rather get one that you know has been finished, and may even go on to more books?

Unless the networks wake up, they’re going to go the way of Blockbuster.

People Connect More to Video Than to Words

            It’s a painful thing to admit as a book writer, but there’s a reason why movies and television are more popular storytelling formats than any type of written material.  The reason is simply because visual mediums appeal to multiple senses; primarily sight and sound.  They more easily and effectively manipulate our emotions.  And, perhaps most importantly, they can be enjoyed in groups.  While reading a book or a short story is an intimate moment between reader and writer, visual productions can bring together multiple audience members at the same time and cause them to all feel the same thing at the same moment.

            An example of this is John Green of the Vlog Brothers on Youtube.  He speaks poetically and quite well about how reading is a shared experience between author and reader.  However, even he has to admit that his fame came not through his books, but through his program with his brother.  It was once the audience could see him, hear him, and get a sense of his feelings through his expressions that they connected with him, and wanted to know more about what he was writing.

            Books that have been made into movies always do better than before they were put on film.  Even though the movies ruin the endings and every secret in these books, people become curious about what’s in the book in addition to the film.  Not only is there a lot of free advertising, but once people have heard voices of the characters, even though it’s stolen away their ability to make their own voices, more readers flock to these books because they’ve had a more visceral connection.

            I’ve embraced this fact and started a few Youtube channels of my own.  They have, regrettably, been as unsuccessful as my writing and I struggle to get views.  But I do find it easier to get people to take a chance with one of my videos than it is to get people to take a chance on my writing.  Even trying to get people to read a free short story is a daunting task.

            I’ve become convinced that a healthy mix of these two mediums is the best chance for success.  The difficulty is in juggling my time with these two art forms.